A Wine for the Season

I found a fabulous everyday, bring-to-a-party, serve-at-a-celebration bottle of sparkling rosé. It’s a Domaine Rolet Père et Fils Crémant du Jura. And for about $22/bottle, I had no qualms about going back and buying a few more bottles (which I’ve now taken to almost every brunch or party I’ve attended for the past month).

It’s from Jura. That’s the French region southeast of Champagne recently described as what wine journalists talk about to gain some “counterculture street cred.” It was also the only bottle from Jura at a local shop. And while picking up some other wines, I bought a bottle out of curiosity.

I decided to serve it to a friend who came  over for a festive evening of cheese, meats and wine. The intention was to pour a glass to toast the evening and then move on to some red wines. That plan quickly changed, as we laughed, ate and chatted our way through the entire bottle.

When I brought it to a brunch the following week, a person at the table who declared she didn’t drink sparkling wines, refilled her glass a few times. That bottle was quickly diminished by the table, too.

Here’s what makes the wine worth your while (especially if sparkling wines aren’t your favorite): There are very little bubbles. Those that are there settle quickly and only provide a brief bit of effervescence in the background. It’s acidity balances the tart fruit flavors leaving a dry and crisp finish. While light in body, the fruit-forwardness of this sparkler gives it a solid elegance.

I haven’t decided if this will be my choice for new year’s eve, but I plan to be drinking this many times in the new year. Cheers to 2015!

Stirring the Lees with James Molesworth: Unique Wines on the Outskirts of the Rhône

This morning’s daily news roundup on the Terroirist blog points to this profile on Hervé Souhaut, a French winemaker whose wines I’ve only recently tasted. Wine Spectator writer James Molesworth (who I also recommend following on Instagram) sums up these wines like this (added emphasis is mine):

This was my first visit to Hervé Souhaut and Domaine Romaneaux-Destezet, a relative newcomer which has rapidly become a darling among the hipster set for its pepper- and violet-infused unoaked Syrahs.

Does that mean I (too) have fallen in with this crowd? Regardless, I’ve now sipped the St. Joseph Syrah twice, and both times really enjoyed it. The flavors are not overbearing and there’s an elegant not-quite-full-bodied mouthfeel. It won’t stop you if you’re engaged in conversations with friends, but it has enough interest that when you’re ready to take a break from the mindless chit-chat, it will give you something to pay attention to and more importantly, smile.

You know that feeling when you sip a wine and a grin slowly takes over your face while a warmth makes it way down to your belly as you let out a quiet sigh of happiness? Yeah, that one.

If you’d like to know more about these wines, Molesworth does a good job at introducing the reader to Mssr. Souhaut, and discussing the 2013s.

Contrary to my post earlier this week about the “ecology” of oak, these wines do their best to avoid the stuff:

“I just don’t like the taste of oak, and don’t want the wines marked by oak,” said Hervé with a light shrug.

That’s alright with me: Sometimes you feel like an oak, sometimes you don’t.

Read the full story here: Stirring the Lees with James Molesworth: Unique Wines on the Outskirts of the Rhône

Inside the Barrel

It’s not just about the flavors that Oak imparts, a barrel has its sort of ‘Ecology’ that adds a lot more to a wine than merely Oak flavorings.

Over on the Wine Berserkers  message boards, a new member asked about the difference between mass-produced and boutique wines. Among the discussion, Eric Hall, of Roadhouse Winery in Healdsburg, wrote this simple statement to help the poster understand how barrels provide a different experience than the cheaper oak chips that can often be used in inexpensive or bulk wines.

(photo by Sanjay Acharya via Wikipedia)

But you know me and my affinity for words and ways to communicate about wine. So the use of ecology stood out to me. While I always like to talk about how wine is a living, breathing entity, I rarely think of that during its production phase (after the grapes have left their natural ecology in the vineyard). There’s probably more of an argument to be made that it’s doing most of its living and breathing during this stage, but in my mind, the human manipulation of yeasts, oxygen, carbon dioxide and other chemicals or compounds don’t quite feel very natural.

Eric, however, makes a very good observation and is exactly right to call it an ecology. The barrel, which becomes a wine’s home for days, weeks or for many years, usually goes untouched. The wine, lives, breathes and matures in the vessel. Unlike when bottles or stainless steel vats are used for aging, the wood allows for some oxygen to enter. The wood can also age with the wine, sometimes losing many of the flavors it imparts. Depending on the barrel, it may even soften the wine.

It’s in that barrel where the wine can really do its thing — become more complex, develop new flavors, balance its acids and astringency. And it’s the ecology inside the barrel — where molecules and chemicals dance inside the liquid — that helps wine become wine.

While this may just be an “oh, duh,” moment for me, Eric’s response while helping a newbie understand the mysteries of wine struck me as very poetic, and a reminder of how fragile making wine can be.

American Wine Story: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

image
A fuzzy photo I took during the post-movie Q&A with the director and winemakers.

Last night I attended a screening of American Wine Story here in D.C. It’s a documentary focused on passionate winemakers who left their everyday lives to follow their dreams. It sounds a bit hokey, but it wasn’t. And if you’re in love with wine – and the stories behind the bottle – you will completely relate to these people and most likely be in awe of their ability to take such huge risks and work extremely hard and long hours for either very little or no profit (at least in the first decade or so). There’s no denying that these people are in pursuit of their wildest dreams.

The screening I attended was also a fundraiser, and included a tasting of the wines featured in the films plus a post-movie Q&A with some of the the winemakers. Overall it was a great event, and I’m glad I attended. If I were among the organizers, I would deem the event a rousing success.

But nothing is ever perfect, and everyone’s personal experiences are different, so I thought I’d play a game of “the good, the bad and the ugly.”

The Good

It’s a beautifully shot film and it was very fun to try the wines and hear directly from some of the featured winemakers. The focus wasn’t centered on California, but other wines across the country: A lot about Oregon, some Virginia and a little Missouri and Arizona thrown in. During the Q&A, there were some lovely gems by Luca Paschina, the Italian winemaker at Barboursville, who’s been making wine in Virginia for 25 years. He recognizes success in wine is not just about quality, but the relationships you make. That sentiment is actually an underline current in the film – especially during the telling of Oregon’s Brooks Wine. Luca was realistic, too: Passion is not enough, he says, you have to be in the right place. And I’ll add: at the right time.

The Bad

The opening reception was a bit too long, and the Q&A was a bit too short. Also, not all the wine tables were manned by representatives of their brands (although many were). I realize that’s a difficult thing to manage, but it’s a much different experience when the people pouring the wine have intimate knowledge of it. With a price of $50 to attend the screening of a film that is now available on iTunes, I had slightly higher expectations (maybe, a bit too high).

The Ugly

Fortunately, there’s really not much to write in this category. Attending by myself was a bit lonely during the reception and before the movie began. It didn’t help that there was no cell service in the building. It was a cold and rainy night. Many in attendance had gray or white hair, so I felt a little out of place at times. And those who appeared to be my age were there because they were in the wine business. I had hoped that some other younger (and by younger, I mean 30- or 40-something) enthusiasts might have been there. Or maybe I just was circulating in the wrong parts of the room at the wrong times.

But don’t let “the ugly” cloud this post. I’m very glad I went, and really enjoyed the film.  This tweet I wrote shortly after sums it all up nicely:

Pop Chart Lab –> Design + Data = Delight –> The Genealogy of Wine

Illustration: Pop Chart Lab –> Design + Data = Delight –> The Genealogy of Wine

The folks over at Huffington Post Taste kindly drew my attention to this really cool family tree connecting the hundreds (maybe, more?) of wine grapes. It’s fun visuals like this that makes me wish i had tons of wall space to cover with wine info-graphics.

Working a Wine-Stained Lip to Your Advantage: Gucci Westman’s 60-Second Guide

I discovered this great bit of advice while searching Vogue’s archives for wine-related stories (I’ve been trying to wrap my head around the differences between men and women and their relationships with wine — and how that’s portrayed in the media or in marketing,  but that’s a post and a subject for another time — although if you want to discuss, use my gmail address: itswinebyme).

This is just pure practical advice. I know I’ve been caught more than a few times with some wine blotches on my lips! And with winter coming, it seems like hydration will be even more important! 

Working a Wine-Stained Lip to Your Advantage: Gucci Westman’s 60-Second Guide

Wine on a Pedestal?

The successful wine writer always puts wine on a pedestal, speaks of it in mystical tones. Naturally, one also has to be on that pedestal in order to know about wine, to understand it. Don’t write stupid things like ‘Please join me on my journey to discover wine!’ You don’t want any company on the pedestal. On the pedestal is where the wine writer belongs all alone, gazing down at all those beneath him trying to clamber up the pedestal. From up there, your arms firmly around the mystery and majesty of wine, with your reputation and false humility, you can cast judgments and ratings and scores down upon the masses, as the Greek gods tossed lightning and fate down at mere mortals. And they have to accept it, they don’t have to like it.

Very funny advice this morning from Ron Washman (aka TheHoseMaster of Wine) published on Tim Atkin’s website. The entire column is worth a read, especially for those who appreciate good writing and are trying to understand how the wine community communicates with each other, and to newer audiences.

Red Wine And Exercise: Is A New Study Hype? Or Truth?

It’s impossible to know which nutritional studies to believe these days. The flip-flopping is enough to drive you to drink an entire bottle of wine, whether it’s beneficial or not.

Today, The Washington Post is reporting (and I’m sure many other news outlets and blogs will or have picked it up) that there’s a new report (yes, shocker, I know) reversing the argument that resveratrol in red wine can benefit your body when combined with exercise. 

According to the story: 

But a new study, published in the journal Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, raises questions about that theory. Researchers subjected two groups of patients to high-intensity interval training for four weeks, with one group taking resveratrol while the other was given a placebo. They found that those who took the supplement did not see as many benefits from the physical activity as those who had a placebo.

While the study was small — there were 16 participants — researcher Brendon Gurd, a professor in the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies at Queens University in Canada, noted in a news release that it’s clear that more research needs to be done on this phenomenon. He said his team found that resveratrol somehow appears to “inhibit the body’s normal training response.”

Normally, I would choose to ignore this, especially since I prefer to believe the opposite to be true. (And by my own purely unscientific evidence: Last year I successfully lost 15 pounds by running 30 minutes 3 days a week – and not once did I cut back on my red wine consumption – in fact, it may have increased since it coincided with my developing passion of this subject.)

So here’s my beef with this article (and why I’m babbling about it here): There were only 16 people in this study (and yes, I realize if the results were the opposite, I’d find a way to argue this in the other direction). But here’s the other issue: They tested this by using resveratrol supplements, not by drinking red wine. And while it’s easy to make the leap that because resveratrol is a key component in red wine, whatever is true for resveratrol would be true for red wine, is leaving out some important details to have a valid argument. (I also want to emphasize that it’s the way this story is headlined and written, which is focusing on the red wine connection, not the actual study.)

Could it be that there are certain chemical reactions that happen inside red wine when the resveratrol from the grape skins come into contact with the yeast or sugars during fermentation? Or other chemical reactions found in the final alcoholic product that could be involved with the health benefits other studies have found? We know wine is a living, breathing beast that changes as it ages or when it comes in contact with oxygen, so how is that benefiting the effects of resveratrol?

Without much science in my background, my theories could be hokie – but I wish this article went deeper and took these questions into account so other science novices like me could attempt to make sense of all this.